Friday, March 20, 2026

Remembering the Kinder, Gentler Side of Chuck Norris

News of the death of Chuck Norris in Hawaii on March 19, at the age of 86, has been on every major news service for almost 10 hours now. For many who heard, some could scarcely believe the concept that Mr. Norris would not be one of those who lived to at least 100 years old. After all, he was Chuck Norris.

And the simple invocation of his name was all it took to express an affirmation of your accuracy or strength of position. If Chuck Norris agreed with you, or more likely you with him, that was all the bona fides needed to win your point.

Somewhere in the cinematic world of martial arts, particularly in the earliest days of popularity of taekwondo, Mr. Norris rose to prominence for his skill at an early age in difficult variations of martial arts. It is usually for those skills that people came first to revere him as an icon of massive proportions—real, not imagined. It was his willingness to speak up, however many those against his position, that made him the real subject of admiration of many who saw his image projected only on screens of varying proportions.

It’s really a geographical issue as to how people respond to the iconic name of Chuck Norris. Today he is on the minds and in the hearts of so many people who never met him, yet each of them has a distinct, sincere impression of this man whom many consider a legend. The legend concluded his history, with his death at age 86 in Hawaii on March 19th.

Outside the state of Texas, it’s likely that you’ll associate Norris with one of three things—extraordinary martial artist, movie actor famed for action movies such as the “Missing in Action” or “The Delta Force” series; or TV star most recently known for his production, “Walker, Texas Ranger.”

Born Carlos Ray Norris in Ryan, Oklahoma, on March 10, 1940, he had many professions in his lifetime. He began his military career at age 18 in 1958 in the U.S. Air Force and was stationed at Osan Air Base in South Korea. His assignment there was as an Air Policeman (today we call it Air Force Security Forces), and that provided the opportunity to begin his training in judo on base. In town, the U.S. War Department noted that he found a dojo studio in Osan, where he was introduced to “Tang Soo So, a Korean martial art.” He then went to March Air Force Base in California and was honorably discharged in 1962 with the rank of Airman First Class.

Subsequently he developed skill at taekwondo and “was the first Westerner to be awarded an eighth-degree black belt in taekwondo.” His next venture included teaching karate and opening a chain of schools in Los Angeles. He first became famous for training celebrities in martial arts, including Steve McQueen, Priscilla Presley, and Donny and Marie Osmond. His war department bio notes that Master Norris won the Professional Middleweight Karate Champion at age 28 and kept the title for six years.

Memes have filled the internet for years, proclaiming Chuck Norris as the ultimate “tough guy,” a benchmark for legendary strength with the ability to accomplish seemingly impossible tasks. One example is “Chuck Norris hit 11 out of 10 targets with 9 bullets” and “The flu has to get Chuck Norris shots once a year,” and “Chuck Norris can pass a vision test with his eyes closed.” The occasion to invoke Norris as a source of authority guaranteed social media “likes,” “follows,” and invariably “shares.”

And yet, Chuck Norris—the man, the myth, the legend—was in fact a mere mortal who possessed the greatest strength of all: his faith in God and his strength of character. Unyielding, unafraid, and incredibly unassuming, Chuck Norris in person was simply nothing like the man you see on screen. He was kind, gentle, brilliant, and had a special countenance about him that belied every ounce of muscle jam-packed onto his frame.

My first sighting was in 2015, in the former location of Office Max in College Station one Sunday after church. He and his wife, Gena, were quietly looking at file cabinets, assessing which ones might work best for them. Gena, blond and beautiful, was also approachable and gracious, and both were willing to look other customers in the eye, preferring to act “just like any other shoppers” that day. Of course, I recognized them instantly but simply smiled broadly and gently nodded my head in their direction. They returned the acknowledgement.

It would be less than six months later our paths would cross once more. I was writing 12 columns for the former online examiner.com, an Internet news outlet that was meant to focus on hometown events and celebrate good news, based on the goals of founder Philip Anschutz. It was no competition for our local outlets but it provided creative freedom. I received a press release about a program new to the Bryan Independent School District, Kickstart Kids, founded in 1990 in Houston by Chuck Norris.

The release explained that Davila Middle School was to be one of several new schools in the state to launch a Kickstart Kids karate program in a neighborhood where it could reach the most number of middle school students who could benefit from the program. An instructor was assigned, Master Rommel Gargoles, today an 18-times World Champion in karate, a bright young man who was the perfect guide to instruct these young boys and girls.

I was invited to attend one of their actual classroom experiences at Davila and found these teenagers to be respectful, disciplined, and intensely serious about “getting it right” in terms of the moves required for their tasks. In fact, just as important as the physical accomplishment was the attitude of preparation, execution, and conclusion of the sport. I interviewed Master Gargoles and found that he truly loved being a role model for the young people and spoke of his admiration for Master Norris and the skills he possessed, with modesty about his own accomplishments. A little research produced a hefty resume filled with accolades but, like Chuck Norris, you could not tell it by his demeanor.

During the semester came the opportunity to witness their skill in an outdoor exhibition at the local arena in Navasota, the city where the Norris family had been calling home while raising their family together. Once again, the consistency with which the students showed their talents marked both improvement and increased joy with their accomplishment. Nothing helps “lost” teenagers more than to find measures of success in goals they adopt along the way. Master Gargoles’ praise was on target and appropriate, but not effusive and overdone.

Invited back to attend their graduation ceremony at semester’s end, I had a chance to watch their final maneuvers during which they would accomplish goals such as chopping a wooden plank with their hand or executing a series of moves with various complicated maneuvers I’m ill-equipped to describe correctly. If you know karate, you know what is required to reach each of the belt color status levels. I was invited to sit next to Mr. Norris and his wife, and we did not exchange idle chatter during the exhibition. In fact, beyond a nice “Thank you for being here,” the only thing on Master Norris’ mind was those students and watching each one intensely as they performed the various tasks.

It was at that point that I was convinced of why people were in awe of Chuck Norris. It was his ability to concentrate strictly and intensely on his goal, without distraction interfering. His laser-like focus met their eyes when each one in turn looked over to see if “he” was indeed watching them. And, in fact, he was. The joy and pride in the students’ eyes was unmistakable.

At the reception following the event with folks mingling about, some too afraid to approach him, I walked up and thanked both Mr. and Mrs. Norris for their office team including me throughout the semester to provide the full picture of what Kickstart Kids was all about. I asked them, “What was it that provided inspiration to get all of this going?”

His answer was fast and gentle. Master Norris, now Mr. Norris said, “My wife and I had volunteered to teach a Bible study for our church’s young people and in our first meeting, I was shocked at how casually the students approached the event. They were talking among themselves, not paying too much attention, as though they were disinterested in learning more about the Bible, being ‘a little too old’ for such things.” Continuing he said, “I determined that they needed some discipline, right now, but more importantly they needed a reason to want that discipline.” And Kickstart Kids was born in Houston, and several major local philanthropists there were happy to help get it started. If memory serves, Pres. and Mrs. George H. W. Bush, friends of the family, were happy to offer their support as the Norrises had often been happy to support the endeavors of the Bush Foundation and were present at every major event in Aggieland where they were present.

In fact, one of my dear friends sat next to them at the grand opening of the Bush Presidential Library and Conference Center at Texas A&M, an historic event attended by five living U.S. Presidents. She said they couldn’t have been nicer. That’s the point. Great people are the same 24 hours a day—they never vary to suit the occasion. They simply are good souls.

I have one small regret. As a Certified Life Celebrant, I have the occasional honor of creating and officiating for families the memorial services to remember their loved ones. I have on my desk, still today, the memorial folder of a woman who passed away in 2024 at the age of 57. She graduated from Bryan High at the age of 22 and did not marry but was a constant source of love for and to her large family.

In telling her story, one of the most important things, her family said, was her love of Chuck Norris and how she and her dad loved watching “Walker, Texas Ranger” together. It was “their thing.” His image was one of three major photos fixed on the video wall during visitation and part of the keepsake memorial program. He was “that important” to the young woman and her entire family, whom he never met.

Chuck Norris had exactly that kind of impact on so many people whom he will never realize were positively influenced by him. I kept that program on my desk, intending to send it to Mr. Norris’ office in Navasota, the headquarters for one of his enterprises, CForce Water.

Call it good fortune or serendipity, but water from an artesian source under the Norris Lone Wolf Ranch in Navasota is bottled, sold, and distributed far and wide. It’s okay if your natural thought flows as: “Chuck Norris didn’t discover the water; the water came looking for Chuck Norris” and you’d be justified in saying that without being ridiculed. You put good energy into the world and with God’s help, it flows back to a source of goodness, enriched and improved along the way.

On Instagram today, the Norris family issued a brief statement about their leader’s passing as being “the heart of our family.” Their final words are all that need saying, and somehow you know he’s enjoying his heavenly reward as he read:

“He lived his life with faith, purpose, and an unwavering commitment to the people he loved. Through his work, discipline, and kindness, he inspired millions around the world and left a lasting impact on so many lives.”

As of this writing, after 13 hours, the post has 1,900,000 likes and 88,700 comments and counting.

Well done, thou good and faithful servant. Amen and amen.

Saturday, January 31, 2026

Women are Listening to Message of TAMU Regents— After 57+ Years, Women Are Back to Zero

After 57 years, when Texas A&M First “went fully coeducational,” yesterday’s actions by the TAMU Board of Regents basically reverted the status of women akin to a “limited basis” conditional enrollment of study. Today, women of all ages are listening very closely to what Texas A&M administration, at all levels, is saying via their decision to end Women’s and Gender Studies as a major, to cease offering curriculum and bachelor degrees in these majors.

Yesterday, in addition to cancelling six (6) unidentified classes and granting exemptions to 48 of them, TAMU Provost Alan Sams said, “…the university is ending the Women’s and Gender Studies program to comply with system policies…including the ‘difficult decision’ to begin winding down the Women’s and Gender Studies academic programs, including the BA, BS, Graduate Certificate and the Minor.”

“Effective immediately, students will not be able to enroll in these curricular options.” The communique is from Texas A&M Senior Executive Associate Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences, Cynthia Werner, notifying faculty for Women’s and Gender Studies that Interim President Tommy Williams has closed the program.

The goal of Women’s and Gender Studies was advertised in the TAMU course catalog as “attractive to employers looking for recruits trained in: critical thinking, organizational skills, reading, writing, and presenting.” Further, “specialists…find opportunities in counseling, health care, media, and social work…also excellent preparation for engaging in public policy, law and education in science fields.”

Deciding to end these degrees and course offerings affects both women and men who studied these subjects as well. Such actions comprise deep censorship and squelching of academic freedom. Discussing topics does not imply indoctrination.

That’s the fatal flaw of most obliteration of “things different from you” in courses of study: the fear that if one studies something, immediately a person will adopt a philosophy, path, pattern, or behavior they read about.

It does not harm anyone to study this subject matter, despite the fears of those who are uninformed.

Some of the discontinued classes (taken directly from the online TAMU catalog) include:

WGST 207 Introduction to Gender and Society

Historical and cross-cultural perspectives on women's roles in culture, the workplace, the family and other socio-political institutions; the social construction of gender; sexuality and racism; social control mechanisms and ideologies.

WGST 213 Gender and Health

An examination of social and historical context of health in the U.S., including inequities in health by gender, race, class and gendered issues in health professions.

WGST 300 Psychology of Women

Theoretical and research literature relevant to psychological assumptions about the female personality; challenges to and verification of these assumptions by recent experimental studies.

WGST 303 Psychology of Women of Color

Interdisciplinary theories to study the unique yet intersectional experiences of women from different racial groups, ethnicities, nationalities and cultural backgrounds; scholarly research from the diversity science field; contemporary topics that have developed in a global context; examination of complex issues, which affect women of color across the lifespan.

WGST 315 The Marriage Institution

Courtship, engagement, marriage, family formation, personal adjustment, conflict, financing and child rearing.

WGST 316 Sociology of Gender

Sociological explanations of status differences between men and women; cross-cultural comparisons; gender role socialization, cultural stereotypes, discrimination; gender roles and status in the family, economy, religion, science, other social institutions; deviance, victimization and gender; recent social changes.

WGST 330 Women in Ancient Greece and Rome

Survey of women in classical Greece and Rome; emphases on female occupations and family relationships, legal and political status, traditional values, notorious women, how women were viewed and how they viewed themselves.

WGST 334 Women’s Health

A broad range of health issues that are either unique to women or of special importance to women; information for the health consumer; preparation as an advocate of healthy lifestyles; awareness of the role health plays in the life of all women.

WGST 367 Women in Government in Comparative Perspective

Examination of women's representation in government based on comparison across multiple nation-states; focus on legislative and executive branches of democratic governments.

Other class offerings in the curriculum deal specifically with LGBTQ+ issues. The mere mention of the acronym causes some a kneejerk reaction and potential claim that Texas A&M is indoctrinating students to “this way of life.”

This is frequently followed by the proclamation that such teachings are “woke.” Learning and critical thinking are personal choices.

The word “inclusion” has become an epithet spewed from some speakers as though it were a contagion. In polite society, including someone meant making sure no one was left out, as that does cause harm, all other things being equal.

One has only to walk across the TAMU campus and take in the art, music, books in the library, catch an OPAS show or BVSO concert, University Orchestra program, Century Singers, and Singing Cadets concert, and performances on Kyle Field from the inimitable Fightin’ Texas Aggie Band to know what levels of culture have been amassed here for the purpose of learning to appreciate art for art’s sake.

Yet, no one asks whether some of the art was created by members of what is today known as the LGBTQ+ community. It would appear hypocritical to patronize, appreciate, laud, and honor various works of art as masterpieces, paying hundreds of thousands of dollars for their collections, to book a show, or to perform musical works, and then not want to allow one’s young people to study about the artists because of their potential lifestyle categorization.

TAMU Regents failed to consider long-ranging repercussions of their latest decision. The current Board includes members of two majority categories (visit their online bios):

Robert L. Albritton, Jay Graham, David Baggett, John Bellinger, James R. “Randy” Brooks, Michael A. “Mike” Hernandez III, William “Bill” Mahomes Jr., Kelley Sullivan Georgiades, and Sam Torn with student regent Jaquavous S. Doucette.

These same regents are responsible for:

November 2025—"a policy requiring campus presidents to sign off on courses that could be seen as ‘advocating race and gender ideology or topics related to sexual orientation or gender identity.”

December 2025—" TAMU Regents voted to ban “most discussions of these topics in introductory or core curriculum classes. Exceptions could be made if administrators determined the material serves a necessary educational purpose.”

January 2026—"Cancellation of the ethics and public policy course taught by Dr. Leonard Bright of the Bush School of Government and Public Service.” Dr. Bright had been teaching this course for over 15 years here.

January 2026—Ending the Women’s and Gender Studies program to comply with system policies…"including the ‘difficult decision’ to begin winding down the Women’s and Gender Studies academic programs, including the BA, BS, Graduate Certificate and the Minor.”

The email came from the female Texas A&M Senior Executive Associate Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences, Cynthia Werner, not the male Interim University President Tommy Williams. No called meeting of faculty, no discussion with students presently enrolled in these degree majors, only an edict.

Besides freedom of speech, the university leadership and professors specifically are to have academic freedom, per the guidelines of the American Association of University Professors.

From the AAUP website:

“Advancing and protecting academic freedom is the AAUP's core mission. Academic freedom is the indispensable requisite for unfettered teaching and research in institutions of higher education. As the academic community's core policy document states, ‘Institutions of higher education are conducted for the common good and not to further the interest of either the individual teacher or the institution as a whole. The common good depends upon the free search for truth and its free exposition’ (1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure, which has been endorsed by more than 280 national scholarly and educational associations).”

Finally, on January 30, the announcement came: TAMU Regents are “looking to begin semiconductor institute construction this year” at the RELLIS campus. Semiconductors represent an industry filled with visiting scholars from all over the world, specifically individuals who are in Texas on H1-B visas, many of whom are women.

Governor Abbott has ordered a freeze on H1-B visas at state agencies and launched an investigation about “bringing in high-skilled workers from other countries.”

One cannot properly address H1-B visas without reviewing the language on the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration website as to the classification of nonimmigrants: “This nonimmigrant classification applies to people who wish to perform services in a specialty occupation, services of exceptional merit and ability relating to a Department of Defense (DOD) cooperative research and development project, or services as a fashion model of distinguished merit or ability.”

The cost of Texas A&M today has skyrocketed in the past decade. For those whose parents are paying tuition, one projects that many years of savings and sacrifices went into amassing the expenses for four years of tuition, fees, books, room and board. This does not include parking, sports passes, entertainment, and vacations for spring and summer breaks. Many students sit out a year while working to save who are paying their own tuition. They acquire massive debt in student loans to finish their degrees. One rightfully expects value for their sacrifice.

Many were not aware until today: Yale University is offering free tuition for those whose family income does not exceed $200,000. The “best and brightest” minds might well choose Yale over A&M, or any other school where academic freedom flourishes. Female scholars and future leaders who might have once chosen to attend or teach at Texas A&M or other state schools will be lost to any schools not governed by state politics.

Diversity is the key to an intelligent population. Discussion is the key to finding (equal) solutions. Decisions are made by collective intelligence of a group (inclusion). As a wise professor of educational administration once said, “No one person is as smart as all of us.”

Women are watching. Women are discussing. Women are deciding.

TAMU Regents: What exactly are you saying to welcome women today and for the future?

Women are listening—and so are their parents, spouses, brothers, husbands, children, and friends—all of whom spend money here. It’s not just Texas watching; the country is aware: check the AP Wire.

[Photo licensed and used courtesy of kieferpix]